Original Article

Year : 2018

Volume : Volume 9

Issue : Issue 1

The Effect of Pro-Argin Technology vs Nano Technology using Commercially Available Dentifrice: A Comparative Study

Dr. Harsh Kumar.

Address for correspondence :
Dr. Harsh Kumar.
HarshKumar@gmail.com

Abstract


Aim:  The aim of this clinical study was to clinically evaluate the effect of two commercially available dentifrice formulation.  Materials and Method: 30 patients having at least 2 sensitive teeth with a VRS (Verbal Rating Scale) of >5 after air blast stimulation, qualified to participate in the study. Group 1 (colagte pro-Argin toothpaste) and Group 2(Aclaim), each containing 15 participants, were subjected to cold water and air blast stimulation for an assessment of DH at baseline and after 3 days usingVRS scores. Statistical Analysis used: independent t-test and paired t test.  Results: Air blast test within the groups showed a statistical significance (p<0.001). Statistically no significant difference was found between both group 1 (Pro Argin) and group 2 (Aclaim) and with both the tests.  Conclusion: both the dentifrices Pro-ArginTM and AclaimTM were found to provide rapid relief in patients reporting with Dentinal Hypersensitivity.

Keywords: Dentinal hypersensitivity, Colgate Pro-ArginTM, AclaimTM.