Original Article

Year : 2019

Volume : Volume 10

Issue : Issue 1s

A Comparative analysis of the microleakage of three different direct restorative materials amalgam (AA), glass ionomer cements (GIC), and Cention N(CN) in Class II restorations using stereomicroscope

Dr. Pinky Singh.

Address for correspondence :
Dr. Pinky Singh.
pinkysingh@gmail.com

Abstract


Background:  The present study was conducted to compare the microleakage of three different direct restorative materials amalgam (AA), glass ionomer cements (GIC), and Cention N (CN) in Class II restorations using stereomicroscope. Class V cavities were made in thirty intact caries free premolars and restored with restorative materials to be tested respectively. The restored teeth were stored for 24 h in distilled water and thermocycled for 500 cycles between 5°C and 55°C with a dwell time of 30 s in each bath. Samples were immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin dye for 24 h. The teeth were sectioned along the buccolingual direction. Microleakage was evaluated under a stereomicroscope and data subjected to statistical analysis. The study concluded that out of all the restorative materials, CN a newer restorative material displayed minimum microleakage compared to AA and GICs.

Keywords: Microleakage, glass ionomer cements, restorative materials.